§

Dupont Dow Elastomers, LLC

332 N.L.R.B. 1071 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Dupont Dow Elastomers, LLC

12 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  5. Stardyne, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Board's alter ego analysis involved a policy choice that is consistent with the Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Omnitest Inspection Services, Inc.

    937 F.2d 112 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 28 times
    Articulating the federal labor-law doctrine that a newly created corporate entity may remain "subject to all the legal and contractual obligations of [its] predecessor."

  7. Canteen Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    103 F.3d 1355 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming NLRB's finding of substantial continuity where there was no temporal break in the operation of the two businesses

  8. Nazareth Regional High School v. N.L.R.B

    549 F.2d 873 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that, to rebut a presumption of majority status, "the employer must produce clear and convincing evidence of loss of union support capable of raising a reasonable doubt of the union's continuing majority"

  9. Peters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    153 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times
    Granting the Board "latitude" in "interpreting its own rules"

  10. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work