DuPont de Nemours, E. I.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner
  3. Anchortank, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    618 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    In Anchortank, Inc. v. NLRB, 618 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1980), which also arose under the NLRA, this court held that the Weingarten right to representation only exists when a union representative has been elected.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"
  6. Aerovox Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 640 (D.C. Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 11811. Argued December 7, 1953. Decided January 28, 1954. Writ of Certiorari Denied May 17, 1954. See 74 S.Ct. 779. Mr. Harold D. Cohen, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Michael Waris, Jr., and John K. Pickens, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent. Before WILBUR K. MILLER