§

Dunn Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a All Star Chevrolet

265 N.L.R.B. 31 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Dunn Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a All Star Chevrolet

7 Cited authorities

  1. Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle

    429 U.S. 274 (1977)   Cited 9,219 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding if a plaintiff can show a prima facie case of First Amendment retaliation, the district court should go on to determine whether the defendant has shown "by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have reached the same decision ... even in the absence of the protected conduct"

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  5. Northern Ry. Co. v. Page

    274 U.S. 65 (1927)   Cited 40 times
    In Northern R. Co. v. Page, 274 U.S. 65, 47 S.Ct., 491, 493, 71 L.Ed., 929, the Court held: "Under familiar rules, plaintiff was entitled to prevail if the evidence and the inferences that a jury might legitimately draw from it were fairly and reasonably sufficient to warrant a finding in his favor.

  6. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Sayers Printing Company

    453 F.2d 810 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 71-1111, 71-1143. December 31, 1971. Petition for Review and Application for Enforcement of Order of N.L.R.B. Denied January 27, 1972. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Elaine F. Palumbo, Frank Vogl, Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. John H. Doesburg, Phoenix, Ariz., for Sayers Printing Co. Bruce S. Feldacker, Stanley R. Schuchat, Schuchat, Cook Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for Local