§

Druwhit Metal Products Co.

153 N.L.R.B. 346 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Druwhit Metal Products Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 318 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  5. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brown-Dunkin Company

    287 F.2d 17 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 28 times

    No. 6402. January 19, 1961. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. (Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This petition is to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding the respondent, a large department store

  8. Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.

  9. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  10. East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was