§
Drives, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  4. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."

  5. Furr's, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    381 F.2d 562 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times

    No. 8686. February 20, 1967. Rehearing Denied March 24, 1967. Certiorari Denied October 9, 1967. See 88 S.Ct. 70. James H. Milam, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner. Anthony J. Obadal, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and ALDRICH and SETH, Circuit Judges. By special designation. MURRAH, Chief Judge. In this unfair labor practice proceedings the Board found the employer

  6. Amalgamated Clothing Wrks. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Considering employer's "lack of disavowal" of individual's actions

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Ralph Printing Lithographing Co.

    379 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    Recognizing that unfair labor practices claim against employer was subject to "the de minimis rule"

  8. Federation of Un. Representatives v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 407, 408, Dockets 28558, 28598. Argued June 10, 1964. Decided November 20, 1964. Sanford M. Katz, New York City, for Federation of Union Representatives. Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Julius Topol, New York City, on the brief), for International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. Robert G. Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.

    305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Refusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    365 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 9 times

    No. 21779. June 27, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. David L. Hooper, Abilene, Tex., Hooper Perry, Abilene, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The Board seeks enforcement of its order against the respondent. The

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"