§

Drivers Local 695

174 N.L.R.B. 753 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Drivers Local 695

7 Cited authorities

  1. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  2. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  3. Steelworkers v. Labor Board

    376 U.S. 492 (1964)   Cited 75 times
    Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"

  4. New Power Wire and Electric Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    340 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 196, 197, Docket 28597, 28627. Argued December 18, 1964. Decided January 7, 1965. Leonard Seiser, New York City, for petitioner employer. Glen M. Bendixsen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for Board as respondent and petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Union. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and MARSHALL

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management

  6. National Maritime Union of America v. N.L.R.B

    367 F.2d 171 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 18066. October 10, 1966. Rehearing Denied November 3, 1966. Charles Sovel, New York City, for petitioners. Abraham E. Freedman, New York City, was with him on the brief. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Paul M. Thompson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Pierce Butler, III, of Doherty, Rumble Butler, St. Paul, Minn

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Un. Hatters, Cap Millinery

    286 F.2d 950 (4th Cir. 1961)

    No. 8173. Argued November 10, 1960. Decided January 4, 1961. On Petition for Modification of Order and Decree March 8, 1961. Herman I. Branse, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jacob J. Edelman, Baltimore, Md. (Bernard W. Rubenstein, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF