§

Downtowner of Shreveport, Inc.

175 N.L.R.B. 1106 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Downtowner of Shreveport, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 232 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."

  4. American Art Clay Company v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 88 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 6 times
    In American Art Clay Co., supra, however, Judge Duffy, who also wrote the Phoenix Mutual opinion, explained the Phoenix Mutual case in holding that the concerted activity of employees protesting a change in supervisory personnel, which affects their job interests, is not protected under the Act if the character of the concerted activity is intemperate.