§

Dover Caterers Ind d/b/a d/b/a Dover College Services Inc

358 N.L.R.B. 710 (N.L.R.B. 2012)
Dover Caterers Ind d/b/a d/b/a Dover College Services Inc

19 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. Rivera-Vega v. Conagra, Inc.

    70 F.3d 153 (1st Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Finding that an ALJ's conclusion that violations occurred "confirmed" the court's own independent review of the record

  3. Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.3d 955 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 21 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board's "clipped view of the record" did not support its finding that the employer had committed unfair labor practices

  4. Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    229 F.3d 1184 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that although "broader unit encompassing all parts and service department employees at both facilities" may have been appropriate, Board not " required" to include all such employees in unit in light of differences between facilities

  5. Conagra, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1435 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 20 times
    Equating an inability to pay with an inability to afford, and emphasizing that the employer had “stated repeatedly that the company remained profitable”

  6. JHP & Associates, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    360 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2004)   Cited 10 times

    No. 03-2303. Submitted: November 17, 2003. Filed: March 16, 2004. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lawrence P. Kaplan, argued, St. Louis, MO (Joshua M. Avigad, St. Louis, MO, on the brief), for appellant. Jeffrey L. Horowitz, argued, of the NLRB of Washington, D.C. (Charles Donnelly of the NLRB, Washington, D.C. appeared on the brief), for appellee. James I. Singer, argued, St. Louis, MO, intervenor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Harvstone Mfg. Co.

    785 F.2d 570 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Harvstone Mfg. Corp., 785 F.2d 570 (7th Cir.1986), that Circuit declared that claims of competitive disadvantage are “nothing more than truisms” and do not equate to an inability to pay.

  8. International Chem. Work. Union Coun. v. N.L.R.B.

    447 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 7 times
    Considering "whether the Company's actions as a whole satisfied its statutory obligation to bargain in good faith"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  10. Graphic Communications Int. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1168 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3901. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided October 21, 1992. Lee W. Jackson, Martin Ganzglass, O'Donnell, Schwartz Anderson, Washington, D.C., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr. (argued), Logothetis Pence, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Lawrence T. Zimmerman (argued), Washington, D.C., Charles M. Roesch, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for