Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 27, 1943

54 N.L.R.B. 67 (N.L.R.B. 1943)

In the Matter of DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. and INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL No. 235, AFL
In the Matter of DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT, COMPANY, INC., LONG BEACH
PLANT and UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT & AGRICULTURAL IMPLE-
MENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW-CIO)
In the Matter of DouGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC., LONG BEACH PLANT
and GENERAL'TRUCK DRIVERS'LOCAL UNION No. 692, AFL
Cases Nos. 01-R-1984, 21-R-2025 and 21-R-2115, respectively.-
Decided December 27, 19.43
Mr. Harry W. Elliott, of Los Angeles, Calif., for the Company.
Katz, Gallagher & Margolis, by Messers. Charles J. Katz and Leo
Gallagher, both of Los Angeles, Calif., for the U. A. W.
Shibley, Wanner & Litwin, by Messrs. Charles S. Litwin, of Long
Beach, Calif., and Mr. -111. McDonnell, of Wilmington, Calif., for the
Engineers.
Mr. Alvin Roberts, of Long Beach, Calif., for the Teamsters.
Mr. Clifton A. Hix, of Los Angeles, Calif., for the I. A. M.
M1Messers. Al Slater and Jack Grant, both of Los Angeles, Calif., for
the I. B. E. W.
Mr. Don T. Ketchum, of Los Angeles, Calif., for the Welders.
Mr. David V. Easton, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon amended petitions duly filed by International Union of
Operating Engineers, Local 235, AFL, herein called Engineers, and
General Truck Drivers, Local Union No. 692, AFL, herein called
the Teamsters, and upon a second amended petition duly filed by
United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers 'of
America (UAW-CIO), herein called the U. A. W., alleging that a
54 N. L. R. B., No. 15.
67
68 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation
of employees of Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., Long Beach Plant,
Long Beach, California, herein called the Company, the National
Labor Relations Board consolidated the cases and provided for an
appropriate hearing upon due notice before Maurice J. Nicoson, Trial
Examiner. Said hearing was held at Los Angeles, California, on
November 2, 3, and 4,1943. The Company, the Engineers, the U. A. W.,
the Teamsters, International Association of Machinists, Aeronautical
Lodge #1577, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein
called the I. A. M., International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,
Local B-11, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein
called the I. B. E. W., aiid International Union, `United Aircraft
Welders of America, herein called the Welders, appeared, participated,
and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-
examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues.
The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from
prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded
an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Subsequent to the hearing, the Teamsters requested permission to
withdraw its petition. On November 23, 1943, the Board granted the
Teamsters' request, by issuing an order servilig Case No. 21-R-2115
from Cases Nos. 21-R-1984 and 21-R-2025, and closing said case.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its
principal place of business located at Santa Monica, California, is en-
gaged in the manufacture of aircraft. In the course and conduct of its
business, the Company operates several plants in the State of Cali-
fornia and in other States of the United States. We are concerned
herein with that plant of the Company located at Long Beach, Cali-
fornia, designated as the Long Beach plant. The Company purchases
raw materials valued at approximately $70,000,000 per annum for use
at its California plants; approximately 95 percent of these materials
are purchased from sources located outside the State of California.
The Company produces aircraft and aircraft parts at its California
plants, valued at more than $180,000,000 per annum, nearly all of
which is produced for delivery to points outside the State of Cali-
fornia. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within
the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. 69
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of
America is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of In-
dustrial Organizations,. admitting to membership employees of the
Company.
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 235, General
Truck Drivers, Local Union No. 692, International Association of Ma-
chinists, Aeronautical Lodge #1577, and International Brotherhood
of Electrical Workers, Local B-11, are labor organizations affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership
employees of the Company.
International Union, United Aircraft Welders of America, is an
unaffiliated labor organization, admitting to membership employees of
the Company.
III. THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company refuses to recognize any of the labor organizations
involved herein, with the exception of the Welders,' because of their
conflicting claims to representation, and insists upon certification by
the Board before entering upon any bargaining relationship.
Statements of the Field Examiner and the Trial Examiner, intro-
duced into evidence at the hearing, indicate that the Engineers, the
U. A. W., and the I. B. E. W. each represents a substantial number of
employees in the units which each contends is appropriate.2
We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT ; THE DETERMINATION' OF REPRESENTATIVErs
The U. A. W. seeks a unit. comprised of all full-time, hourly paid
production and maintenance employees of the Company, including
I The Company and the welders have previously executed a contract in which the welders
is recognized as the collective bargaining agent of -employees not concerned in this
proceeding
2 The reports of the Field Examiner and the Trial Examiner , taking into consideration
only designations bearing apparently genuine original signatures and containing the names
appearing upon the Company's pay roll of August 15, 1943, may be summarized as follows :
The Engineers represents approximately 31 4 percent of the employees in the unit which
it seeks, the U A. W represents approximately 28 7 percent of the employees in the unit
which it seeks , the I B E W represents approximately 28 3 percent of the employees in
the unit which it seeks, and the I A M. repiesents approximately 5 2 percent of the em-
ployees in the unit which it seeks while we cannot find that the representation of the
I A. M is substantial , we shall accord it a place upon the ballots in the voting groups
hereinafter designated since it has made some showing of membership and inasmuch as
elections are to be conducted therein in any event See Matter of Bell] 7ngton -Ralid, Inc.,
40 N. L. R. B. 1100.
70 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
spot, flash, and seam welders,3 but excluding supervisory employees
above the classification of leadmen, departmental and plant clerical,
employees, timekeepers, time and motion study employees, truck
transportation employees (external transportation department), oxy-
acetylene welders, oxyhydrogen welders, electric are welders, gas
flame cutters, and beginner welders,4 administrative employees, con-
fidential employees, plant protection employees, safety department
employees, employees located at "feeder" plants; schools,- and de-
tached warehouses, and tool liaison men. The I. A. M. agrees gener-
ally with the foregoing unit, but would include therein all depart-
mental and plant clerical employees, timekeepers, safety department
employees, plant protection employees, and tool liaison men .5 The
Company takes a neutral position with respect to the foregoing unit
except with regard to "feeder" plant employees, whom it desires to
include. It indicated, however, that it favored a unit comprised of as
many classifications as feasible ; thus, it would favor the inclusion
within the unit of- departmental and plant clerical employees, time-
keepers, and'employees in schools and detached warehouses, but in
keeping with current Board policy, would favor the exclusion of plant
protection employees. In the main , each of the craft unions herein
involved seeks a unit coextensive with the employees of the Company
who fall within its jurisdiction." Their respective contentions will be
discussed below.
The unit proposed by the Engineers
The Engineers requests a unit comprised of all operators, of overhead
electric cranes, fork trucks, truck cranes, and slueing cranes, and all
employees of the Company engaged as crane riggers. Both the I. A. M.
and the U. A. W. oppose the request of the Engineers, contending that
these employees properly belong within an industrial unit.
The record indicates that most of these employees, comprised of
approximately 78 individuals, are under the jurisdiction of the internal
transportation department of the Company; the remainder are at-
8 These employees are not included within the unit already represented by the Welders,
and the Welders does not claim jurisdiction over them.
These welders and cutters comprise the classifications of employees already represented
for the purposes of collective bargaining by the Welders under a collective bargaining
agreement with the Company . As hereinabove indicated , no question exists with regard
to them.
° Both at the hearing and in its brief , the I . A. M. stated that it did not seriously urge
the inclusion of plant protection and safety department employees within the industrial
unit because of the current policy of the Board. ( See Matter of Draio Corporation,
52 N. L. R. B. 322; Matter of The Brown Paper Mill Company, Inc, 45 N L. R B.
1227; Matter of Mahoning Mining Company, 41 N. L. R. B. 497 ). We shall, in keeping
with the foregoing policy, exclude both classifications of employees from any voting unit
herein designated.
a The I. B E. W., however , confines its unit solely to maintenance employees . Cf. Matter
of General Motors Corporation, Fischer Cleveland Aircraft Division, Plant No. 2, 52
N. L It. B. 1291, as amended.
DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. 71
tached to other departments. On occasion, all are assigned to different
departments where they perform work under the direction and super-
vision of the departmental supervisors, with the occasional assistance
of departmental employees. A study of the airplane manufacturing
industry indicates that the employees sought by the Engineers are
customarily included within an industrial unit, and have not been
accorded the status of a skilled craft.? Moreover, the Board has found
on several occasions that these employees do not form a sufficiently
skilled group to constitute a craft unit." /Nor does the evidence pre-
sented herein convince us that these employees constitute an otherwise
sufficiently homogeneous group to warrant their separation from the
industrial unit.' Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion
that the interests of these employees can best be served by including
them within the industrial unit. We shall, therefore, dismiss the
petition of the Engineers.
The unit proposed by the I. B. E. W.
The I. B. E. W. seeks to represent aunit comprised of all employees
of the Company engaged in its electrical maintenance and electrical
construction departments, including employees engaged in electrical
work at the "feeder" plants hereinafter discussed. Both the U. A. W.
and the I. A. M. oppose any separation of these employees from the
industrial unit, the U. A. W. pointing out that such a unit has not
been granted in any of the airframe plants in the Southern California
area. However, we have found that these employees are a skilled,
homogeneous, and identifiable group which, in the absence of any
contrary history of collective bargaining may properly constitute a
separate appropriate unit.10 On the other hand, it is evident that
these employees might appropriately form part of the broader indus-
trial unit advocated by the U. A. W. and the I. A. M.- Accordingly,
our determination of the unit issue with respect to these employees
will depend in part upon the desires of the employees themselves to
be expressed in the election hereinafter directed.
7 The record indicates that the employees engaged in classifications sought by the Engi-
neers have never been represented as a craft in any of the Southern California airframe
manufacturing plants, and a thorough examination of past Board decisions involving the
aircraft industry indicates no instance wherein such employees have been found to consti-
tute a skilled craft group.
9 Matter of Laclede Steel Company , 49 N L. R. B. 1116, and cases cited therein.
9 Cf. Matter of American Locomotive Company, 45 N. L. R. B. 1239.
10 Matter of Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc ., 50 N. L. R. B. 784; Matter of Douglas Air-
craft Company, Inc, 52 N. L R B 781.
"Matter of Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc., 53 N. L R B. 486; Matter of Laister-
Kauffmann Aircraft Corporation , 52 N. L R . B. 155. In this connection, we note that
the American Federation of Labor specifically reserves to the I. B. E. W. jurisdiction over
these classifications of employees , while reserving to the I. A. M jurisdiction over the re-
maining types of employees in the aircraft industry . See I . A. M. Exh. 1.
72 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL- LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
There remains for consideration the question whether or not elec-
tricians employed at the "feeder" plants may properly be included
within the voting group. The record indicates that the Company
employs maintenance electricians' at only two of its "feeder" plants,
and that the remaining "feeder" plants- are served by electricians
operating out of the Long Beach plant. For reasons hereinafter dis-
cussed we shall exclude from this voting group all electricians per-
manently assigned to the "feeder" plants.
Inclusion or exclusion of miscellaneous groups
Aside from the question of the inclusion of the units sought by the
Engineers and the I. B. E. W. the following classifications within
the industrial unit are in dispute:
Departmental and plant clericals: As hereinbefore indicated, the
U. A. W. would exclude these employees from the industrial unit,
whereas the I. A. M. seeks to include them; the Company, while remain-
ing neutral, tends toward the inclusion of these employees. It was
pointed out at the hearing and in its brief by the U. A. W. that these
classifications of employees have been differentiated from the produc-
tion and maintenance workers under a wage stabilization plan con-
curred in by the I. A. M., the U. A. W., and various aircraft manufac-
turers in the Southern California area. However, such an agreement,
while indicative of the trend in the industry in this section of the Nation
with respect to wage matters, does not necessarily indicate the pro-
priety of their exclusion from the industrial unit. The record discloses
that these employees 'work within the plant itself and, in some in-
stances, under the same department heads as the production and main-
tenance workers; it further appears that many of them are stationed
and perform their duties on the production line itself. We have
recently held-ill a similar proceeding involving another division of
the Company herein that departmental and clerical employees have a
close functional relationship to the production and maintenance
workers, and that they might properly be included within a unit of
such employees12 The evidence presented in the instant proceeding
confirms our previous finding. Accordingly, we shall include depart-
mental and plant clerical employees within the unit 13
Timekeepers: These employees perform the duties usual to this
classification. The U. A. W. advanced the same reason for the exclu-
sion of these employees as it did for the departmental, and plant cleri-
cals, whereas the I. A. M. seeks to include them -within the unit. How-
ever, we have frequently found that,, as differentiated from ordinary
Matter of Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc. (El Segundo Division), 49 N. L. R. B 819.
v This classification includes, among others, such employees as file clerks, department
clerks , general clerks , typists, stenographers , accounting clerks, stock clerks , stock chasers,
project men , and follow -up men.
DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. 73
plant clericals, timekeepers perform duties which, although not dis-
qualifying them from representation for the purposes of collective
bargaining, are not sufficiently akin to those -performed by production
and maintenance employees 'to warrant their inclusion within a unit
of such employees 14 Accordingly, we shall exclude them 15
Tool liaison employees: These employees, originally production
and maintenance workers, act in a liaison capacity between the engi-
neering, tool designing, and tool fabrication departments. Their
duties require that they act in a close functional relationship with
production employees in that they must examine, observe, and experi-
ment with the tools used by the production workers, and also be in
close contact with them. These duties are largely performed directly
on the production line, their observations and suggestions being re-
ported to the tool designing and tool fabrication departments for the
purpose of bettering the tools used by the production workers. The
qualifications for these positions appear to be little greater than those
required of the ordinary production employee; furthermore, the record
indicates that in the event these positions are eliminated, the tool liai-
son employees will be returned, if retained by the Company, to their
former positions as ordinary production or maintenance workers.
Under these circumstances, we shall include tool liaison employees
within the unit of production and maintenance employees.
"Feeder" plant employees: As of the time of the hearing, the Com-
pany operated seven "feeder" plants, all of which are located within
a radius of 61 miles from the main plant at Long Beach. It contends
that the employees engaged therein are properly included within the
industrial unit. Both the I. A. M. and the U. A. W. oppose the inclu-
sion of these employees on the ground that (a) neither labor organiza-
tion knew of the existence of these plants, and had never attempted to
organize them, and (b) the character of the labor employed at these
plants is such that it does not lend itself readily to the principles of
collective bargaining.
The record indicates that the "feeder" plants, all of which were com-
paratively recently organized, are operated as separate departments
of the Company; that they were set up for the purpose of providing
additional facilities for the production of airplanes; and that they
were situated so as to more readily tap sources of labor not available
to the Long Beach plant. The employees engaged at the "feeder"
plants, with the exception of those employed at the Elsinore, Calif or-
nia, plant, work 4-hour shifts, as compared to the employees at the
main plant and the Elsinore plant who put in 8-hour working shifts.
14 Matter of General Motors Corporation, Eastern Aircraft, Trenton Dlvlsion, 51 N. L.
R B 366. Matter of General Motors Coipoiatson (Eastern Aircraft Dtivti.^ion , Baltimore
Plant), 52 N L R B 954
15 Matter of Consolidated Aircraft Corporation , 47 N. L. R B. 30.
74 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
The "feeder" plants do not appear to be permanent additions to the
main plant, and their number may be increased or decreased in accord-
ance with the necessities of business. Each of them has its separate
supervisory hierarchy, although final responsibility rests in the main
plant. Many of the employees engaged at the "feeder" plants hold
full-time positions elsewhere and contribute to the war effort by
working the short shift. The record further indicates that in the
event that the "feeder" plants are no longer needed, the work per-,
formed therein would be transferred back to the main plant. As they
are presently constituted, however, each of the "feeder" plants forms
a separate and distinct entity. Under these circumstances, and in view
of the fact that none of the labor organizations involved herein have
extended their organizing efforts to employees in such "feeder" plants,
we are of the opinion that the employees engaged therein should not
now be included within the same unit or units as the Long Beach em-
ployees. We shall, therefore, exclude all employees engaged at
"feeder" plants from the voting groups in which elections are herein-
after directed.
Warehouse and school employees: The Company maintains, in con-
junction with its operations at Long Beach, several detached ware-
houses. Both the U. A. W. and the I. A. M. agree that the employees
engaged therein should be excluded from the industrial unit, whereas
the Company is inclined toward the position that they should be
included. The-record indicates that these employees, thus far unor-
ganized, have little contact with the production and maintenance,
workers at the main plant. Under these circumstances, we shall ex-
clude them from the industrial unit.16
Several employees of the Company are being trained in publicly
owned schools under State-paid instructors. After the completion of
their training, these student-employees are placed by the Company
in positions on the production or assembly lines. Both the I. A. M.
and the U. A. W. seek the exclusion of these employees, whereas the
Company would be inclined to include them. We are of the opinion
that these employees, until they have completed their training period,
do not have such a substantial interest in their positions as to warrant
their being placed in a unit of regular plant employees. We shall,
therefore, exclude them.17
Four-hour shift employees: The majority of these employees are
engaged at the • "feeder" plants operated by the Company, and are
therefore excluded from the voting units. Our finding in this respect
does not apply to those 4-hour shift employees engaged at the main
plant. On the contrary, those employees at the main plant working
11 Matter of Val Vita Food Products, Inc., 45 N. L. R. B. 23.
17 Matter of Consolidated Aircraft Corporation, 47 N. L. R. B. 30.
DOUGLAS -AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. 75
half shifts are performing their duties under the same conditions of
employment as the full-time employees, and have a definite interest
in their working conditions. They are, therefore, properly included
within a collective bargaining unit with the full-time employees 18.
Accordingly, we shall include within the voting units those 4-hour
shift employees not engaged at the "feeder" plants.
We shall make no 'final determination with respect to the appro-
priate unit or units pending the outcome of the elections hereinafter
directed. We shall direct that separate elections by secret ballot be
held among the employees in each of the voting groups below set
forth, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of the Direction of Elections herein, subject to
the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction :
(1) All employees of the Company in its electrical maintenance
and electrical construction departments, including leadmen 18 and
4-hour shift employees not engaged, at the "feeder" plants operated
by the Company; but excluding supervisory employees with authority
to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in
the status of employees,,or effectively recommend such action, to
determine whether they desire to be represented by the I. B. E. W.,
the I. A. M., the U. A. W., or none; and
(2) All remaining hourly paid production and maintenance em-
ployees of the Company, including spot, flash, and seam welders, de-
partmental and plant clericals, tool liaison employees, 4-hour shift
employees not engaged at "feeder" plants, and leadmen,20 but exclud-
ing timekeepers, "feeder" plant employees, detached warehouse
employees, school employees, plant protection employees, safety de-
partment employees, time and motion study employees, truck trans-
portation department employees (external transportation depart-
ment), oxyacetylene, oxyhydrogen, and electric are welders, gas
flame cutters, beginner welders, administrative employees, confiden-
tial employees, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire,
promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the sta-
tus of employees, or effectively recommend such action, to determine
whether they desire to be represented by the U. A. W., the I. A. M.,
or neither.
Upon the results of the elections in said groups will depend, in part,
our determination of the appropriate unit or units.
Is Matter of The New Britain Machine Company , 48 N. L. R. B. 263, and cases cited
therein.
10 Matter of Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc ., 53 N. L. R. B. 486 . See also Matter of
Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc ., Case No . 16-11-759, issued December 16, 1943, 53
N L. R. B 1203.
20 See footnote 19, supra.
76 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL% LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain repre-
sentatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Douglas Air-
craft Company , Inc., Long Beach, California , elections by secret bal-
lot shall be conducted as early as possible , but not later than thirty
(30) days from the date of this Direction of Elections, under the di-
rection and supervision of the Regional Director for the Twenty-first
Region, acting in this , matter as agent for the National Labor Rela-
tions Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said
Rules and Regulations, among the groups of employees described be-
low who were employed by the Company at its Long Beach, Califor-
nia, plant, during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date
of this Direction of Elections, including employees who did not work
during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or tem-
porarily laid off, and including persons in the armed forces of the
United States who present themselves in person at the polls , but ex-
cluding employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause
and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the
elections :
(1) All employees of the Company in its electrical maintenance and
electrical construction departments , including leadmen and 4-hour
shift employees not engaged at the "feeder" plants operated by the
Company, but excluding all supervisory employees with authority to
hire, promote , discharge , discipline , or otherwise effect changes in the
status of employees , or effectively recommend such action , to determine
whether they desire to be represented by United Automobile , Aircraft
& Agricultural Implement Workers of America, affiliated with, the
Congress of Industrial Organizations , International Association of
Machinists , Aeronautical Lodge #1577, affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,
Local B-11, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, for
the purposes of collective bargaining , or by none;
(2) All remaining hourly paid production and maintenance em-
ployees of the Company , including , leadmen, spot , flash, and seam
welders, departmental and plant clericals , tool liaison employees, and
4-hour shift employees not employed at "feeder " plants, but excluding
timekeepers , "feeder" plant employees , detached warehouse employees,
school employees , plant protection employees , safety department
employees , time and motion study employees , truck transportation
DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT COMPANY, INC. 77
department employees (external transportation department), oxy-
acetylene, oxyhydrogen, and electric are welders, gas flame cutters,
beginner welders, administrative employees, confidential employees,
and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, dis-
charge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of em-
ployees, or effectively recommend such action, to determine whether
they desire to be represented by United Automobile, Aircraft
Agricultural Implement Workers of America, affiliated with the
Congress of Industrial Organizations, International Association of
Machinists, Aeronautical Lodge #1577, affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by
neither.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the petition for investigation and
certification of representatives of employees of Douglas Aircraft Com-
pany, Inc., Long Beach Plant, Long Beach, California, filed by
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 235, AFL,
be, and it hereby is, dismissed.