Double D Construction Group
6 Cited authorities
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Beltran-Tirado v. I.N.S.
213 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 105 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that § 408(B) is not a CIMT in part because the acts it proscribes are "mala prohibita , not mala in se "
N.L.R.B. v. General Fabrications Corp.
222 F.3d 218 (6th Cir. 2000) Cited 25 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding the NLRB is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged portions of orders
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera
179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 24 timesNo. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,059 times 23 Legal AnalysesFinding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB