§

Donzaleigh D. Frazier, Appellant, v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

01974053 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 29, 1999)
Donzaleigh D. Frazier, Appellant, v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,401 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  2. St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks

    509 U.S. 502 (1993)   Cited 12,282 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

  3. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 19,994 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

  4. O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.

    517 U.S. 308 (1996)   Cited 2,069 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that inference of age discrimination cannot be drawn from “replacement of one worker with another worker insignificantly younger”

  5. Bundy v. Jackson

    641 F.2d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 400 times
    Holding that where a plaintiff alleges that she was denied an increase in pay and grade, the relevant inquiry is whether a similarly-situated person outside the plaintiff's protected class requested and received the same kind of promotion or increase under similar circumstances

  6. Smith v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

    770 F.2d 719 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 96 times
    Finding much stronger comparative evidence insufficient as a matter of law