Donna Davis, Complainant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,681 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute
  2. Blum v. Stenson

    465 U.S. 886 (1984)   Cited 8,873 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting is “to be calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant community, regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by private or nonprofit counsel”
  3. Copeland v. Marshall

    641 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 1,023 times
    Holding that "in Title VII and similar fee-setting cases," a court may grant an "adjustment to reflect the delay in receipt of payment" because such delay "deprives the eventual recipient of the value of the use of the money in the meantime"
  4. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense

    675 F.2d 1319 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 524 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a fee application must "contain sufficiently detailed information about the hours logged and the work done"
  5. McKenzie v. Kennickell

    645 F. Supp. 437 (D.D.C. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    In McKenzie, Judge Parker — on a different record — awarded an enhancement for quality of representation based in part on the exceptional performance of two young associates.
  6. Veterans Ed. Project v. Secretary, Etc.

    515 F. Supp. 993 (D.D.C. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    Civ. A. 79-210. May 15, 1981. Barton F. Stichman, National Veterans Law Center, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Kenneth M. Raisler, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendants. MEMORANDUM AUBREY E. ROBINSON, JR., District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees in the above captioned Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation. 5 U.S.C. § 552. On February 25, 1981 this Court issued a Memorandum and Order, 509 F. Supp. 860, that (1) briefly reviewed this litigation

  7. Section 2000e-5 - Enforcement provisions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5   Cited 26,978 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding charges must be made in writing, under oath, and contain all information as the Commission requires
  8. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,954 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"