§

Domsey Trading Corp.

357 N.L.R.B. 2161 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
Domsey Trading Corp.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.

    501 U.S. 32 (1991)   Cited 9,486 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial" may "assess attorney fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons," and "may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute"

  2. Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    535 U.S. 137 (2002)   Cited 322 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

  3. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Greater Kansas City Roofing

    2 F.3d 1047 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Holding it was error to hold sole shareholder personally liable for judgment against corporation she controlled because that there was no evidence to suggest her disregard for many corporate formalities constituted fraud or was done to cause the company to be less able to pay a judgment

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Bolivar-Tees

    551 F.3d 722 (8th Cir. 2008)   Cited 23 times
    Finding that the party arguing to pierce the veil "bears the burden of proving that there are substantial reasons for doing so"

  6. Pierce v. United States

    255 U.S. 398 (1921)   Cited 119 times
    In Pierce v. United States, 255 U.S. 398, 41 S.Ct. 365, 65 L.Ed. 697 (1921), for example, the government had obtained a conviction against a corporation and sought to enforce the penalty against the stockholders to whom the dissolved corporation's assets had been distributed.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Domsey Trading Corp.

    636 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Noting that “the Board enjoys broad discretion in fashioning remedies under the NLRA”

  8. Bufco Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    147 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 20 times
    Finding two corporations to be alter egos despite the allegation that defendants conducted and recorded all corporate meetings

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Intern. Measurement Control Co.

    978 F.2d 334 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 25 times
    Finding conveyance fraudulent under section 6(b) of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act where that the defendant paid off debts to insiders when the defendant was insolvent and the insiders knew the defendant was insolvent

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. West Dixie Enterprises, Inc.

    190 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 3 times

    No. 98-5192 Non-Argument Calendar DECIDED July 20, 1999. John D. Burgoyne, Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, Frederick C. Havad, Christopher W. Young, NLRB, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Ira Hatch, Vero Beach, FL, for Respondents. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, (July 20, 1999). D.C. Docket No. 12-CA-16716. Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: West Dixie Enterprises, Inc. and Carole Ann and Paul Paolicelli appeal the

  11. Section 3001 - Applicability of chapter

    28 U.S.C. § 3001   Cited 841 times
    Stating that the chapter including § 3205"provides the exclusive civil procedures for the United States ... to recover a judgment on a debt"

  12. Section 1005 - Procedure after dissolution

    N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 1005   Cited 145 times

    (a) After dissolution: (1) The corporation shall carry on no business except for the purpose of winding up its affairs. (2) The corporation shall proceed to wind up its affairs, with power to fulfill or discharge its contracts, collect its assets, sell its assets for cash at public or private sale, discharge or pay its liabilities, and do all other acts appropriate to liquidate its business. (3) After paying or adequately providing for the payment of its liabilities: (A) The corporation, if authorized