Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 275 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014) Cited 31 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8
Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
255 F.3d 363 (7th Cir. 2001) Cited 33 times
Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"
Directv, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
837 F.3d 25 (D.C. Cir. 2016) Cited 7 times 3 Legal Analyses
According "considerable deference" to the Board's reasonable conclusions on malicious intent
Three D, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
629 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2015) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"
Beverly Health and Rehabilitation v. N.L.R.B
297 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2002) Cited 11 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center
916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990) Cited 17 times
Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,074 times 23 Legal Analyses
Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group

9 Cited authorities

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

According "considerable deference" to the Board's reasonable conclusions on malicious intent

Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"

Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities

Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB