§

Dodger Theatricals Holdings

347 N.L.R.B. 953 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Dodger Theatricals Holdings

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Public Serv. Elec. Gas Co.

    157 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Joining several courts of appeals in applying the clear and unequivocal notice rule, namely that "[t]he 10(b) period begins when the victim of an unfair labor practice receives unequivocal notice of a final adverse decision. Rumors or suspicions will not do. . . ."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.

    950 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that employer "waived the issue of deadlock by failing to present evidence of deadlock before the ALJ"

  6. Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.3d 1295 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding the Board’s finding of a violation where "the information was sought and needed to enable the Union to make an informed judgment" about pursuing contract violation remedies

  7. Union Builders, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    68 F.3d 520 (1st Cir. 1995)   Cited 9 times
    Explaining that employers must "divulge information of even merely potential relevance"

  8. Local 13, Detroit Newspaper, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 267 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 24 times
    Clarifying that the good-faith requirement applies both to employer and union

  9. Sheet Metal Workers' Intl. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    989 F.2d 515 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 7 times

    No. 91-1642. Argued January 25, 1993. Decided April 6, 1993. Donald W. Fisher, Toledo, OH, with whom Samuel C. McKnight, Southfield, MI, and Judith E. Rivlin, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for petitioners. Julie Broido, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter Winkler, Supervisory Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Special Mine Services, Inc.

    11 F.3d 88 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 6 times
    Discussing the "depressing pattern" of Board decisions in which "[t]here is one serious issue, which the Board tucks into a footnote"