§

Dixie Highway Express, Inc

153 N.L.R.B. 1224 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Dixie Highway Express, Inc

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company

    302 F.2d 342 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times
    Excluding "the period during which the bargaining relationship was suspended by litigation of the Company's unfair labor practices"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transportation Company

    308 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times

    No. 8497. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided September 4, 1962. Robert Sewell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (J.W. Alexander, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Bolt Company

    313 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19652. February 13, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. W.D. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Vinson, Elkins, Weems Searls, Houston, Tex., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Jr., Circuit Judge. The case

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Savoy Laundry, Inc.

    327 F.2d 370 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In Savoy Laundry the employer operated one laundry plant where he processed both retail laundry pickups and wholesale laundering.

  9. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    162 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 18 times
    In Allis-Chalmers the employer downgraded the status of plant inspectors after they had voted to join a union, and it was apparent that the employer acted only because of the inspectors' membership in the union.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Exchange Parts Company

    304 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19106. June 22, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether it is an unfair labor practice for an employer to