§

Divi Carina Bay Resort

356 N.L.R.B. 316 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Divi Carina Bay Resort

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  4. N.L.R.B. v. V S Schuler Engineering, Inc.

    309 F.3d 362 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times
    Finding no past practice of soliciting grievances and thus, solicitation of grievances during union organizing campaign violated the NLRA

  5. Pearson Education, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.3d 127 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 5 times
    Stating "clear and well-settled" principle that Board interrogates election conduct for whether "the challenged actions had a reasonable tendency to interfere with employee free choice"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Eskimo Radiator Mfg. Co.

    688 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Eskimo Radiator Mfg., 688 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1982), we concluded that the employer had not shown it was prejudiced by the Regional Director's failure to forward certain affidavits, because even assuming the truth of the employer's allegations, there was no reason to overturn the election.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Los Angeles New Hospital

    640 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    No. 80-7073. Argued and Submitted November 5, 1980. Decided March 6, 1981. Susan L. Dolin, Richard M. Fischl, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Catherine Hagen, O'Melveny Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and TANG, Circuit Judges, and HANSON, Senior District Judge. The Honorable William C. Hanson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern and Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mike Yurosek Sons, Inc.

    597 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 9 times

    No. 77-1775. January 22, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 3, 1979. Richard Brooks (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Michael B. Roger (argued) of Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for Butchers Union Local 193. Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MERRILL and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge. Honorable John R. Bartels, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Arrow Elastic Corp.

    573 F.2d 702 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 8 times
    In Arrow, we found substantial evidence to uphold the finding of the Board that a speech by the employer promising that a fixed pension plan would be added to the existing profit sharing program was a promise of benefits resulting in an unfair labor practice.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Lumber and Mill Employers Ass'n

    736 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1984)

    No. 83-7117. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1984. Decided June 27, 1984. Howard Perlstein, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.K. Abraham, Robert M. Cassel, Berman, Cassel Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

  11. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,370 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Making affidavits and declarations effectively synonymous