Divi Carina Bay Resort
5 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Financial Institution Employees, Local 1182
475 U.S. 192 (1986) Cited 76 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that labor law prohibits the assignment or transfer of a collective bargaining agreement against the wishes of the workers for whom the agreement provides representation
Sullivan Bros. Printers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
99 F.3d 1217 (1st Cir. 1996) Cited 11 timesFinding that the NLRB relied on substantial evidence and properly applied the law in refusing to order employer to honor a dues checkoff provision after the NLRB determined that the contract had expired
May Dept. Stores Co. v. N.L.R.B
897 F.2d 221 (7th Cir. 1990) Cited 10 timesObserving that the Board compares pre- and post-merger unions for continuity by looking to the "structure, administration, officers, assets, membership, autonomy, by-laws, size, and territorial jurisdiction, with an eye toward changes in the rights and obligations of the union's leadership and membership, and in the relationships between the putative bargaining agent, its affiliate, and the employer"
Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op. v. N.L.R.B
32 F.3d 390 (8th Cir. 1994) Cited 3 timesNos. 93-2530, 93-2698. Submitted May 12, 1994. Decided August 22, 1994. John J. McGirl, Jr., Minneapolis, MN, argued (James C. Ohly, on the brief), for appellant. William A. Baudler, Washington, DC, argued (Linda Dreeben and Deborah E. Shrager, on the brief), for appellee. Petition for review of order from National Labor Relations Board. Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON and JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judges. JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative petitions
News/Sun Sentinel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
890 F.2d 430 (D.C. Cir. 1989) Cited 6 timesChallenging employer has burden of proving discontinuity, and Board findings regarding continuity are conclusive if supported by substantial record evidence