§

District Lodge 94, Int'l Assn. of Machinists, Etc.

126 N.L.R.B. 1265 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
District Lodge 94, Int'l Assn. of Machinists, Etc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking

    210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gottfried Baking Co., 210 F.2d 772 (2 Cir., 1954), this court considered and rejected the same argument on nearly identical facts: "We think it is unimportant whether or not the Association existed as a formal entity, so long as it is clear that [the employer] acted jointly with other employers in the Association in the negotiation of collective agreements, as the impact upon interstate commerce would be the same in either case."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 369 International Hod Carriers' Building & Common Laborers' Union

    240 F.2d 539 (3d Cir. 1956)   Cited 10 times

    No. 11945. Argued October 5, 1956. Decided December 3, 1956. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1957. Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Albert K. Plone, Camden, N.J., (Plone Tomar, Camden, N.J., on the brief), for Local 369, International Hod Carriers' Building and Common Laborers' Union of America, AFL, respondent

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Okla. City

    235 F.2d 105 (10th Cir. 1956)   Cited 7 times

    No. 5262. July 5, 1956. Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. Frank Grayson, Oklahoma City, Okla., for respondent. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and ROGERS, District Judge. ROGERS, District Judge. This proceeding was brought to this Court by a Petition to the Court for the enforcement of an Order heretofore entered by the petitioner,

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Internationl Ass'n of Machinists

    241 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    No. 15099. February 20, 1957. Theophill C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose and Melvin Pollack, Attys., Washington, D.C., and Ralph H. Nutter, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Plato Papps, Washington, D.C., Harold A. Cranefield, Gen. Counsel, and Kurt L. Hanslowe, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, ORR, Circuit Judge, and ROSS, District Judge. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The Board, having held that Respondent Union