§

District Council 9, Brotherhood Of Painters

176 N.L.R.B. 599 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
District Council 9, Brotherhood Of Painters

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians

    226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 39 times

    No. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Hod Carriers, Building & Common Laborers' Union of America, Local No. 1140

    285 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1960)   Cited 18 times

    No. 16538. December 22, 1960. Allan I. Mendelsohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for respondents. David D. Weinberg, Omaha, Neb., on the brief. Before WOODROUGH, VAN OOSTERHOUT, and MATTHES, Circuit Judges. MATTHES

  6. N.L.R.B. v. District Council of Painters #48

    340 F.2d 107 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 5 times

    No. 19263. January 5, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert M. Ansell, Richman, Garrett Ansell, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Alexander H. Schullman, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent Union, Paint Makers Local #1232. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the

  7. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB