ยง

District 50, United Mine Workers of America, Etc.

142 N.L.R.B. 930 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
District 50, United Mine Workers of America, Etc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Leedom v. Kyne

    358 U.S. 184 (1958)   Cited 727 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 64 times
    In Douds v. International Longshoremen's Association, 241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957), we upheld the district court's granting of a preliminary injunction sought by the Board against a union.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. J.W. Rex Company

    243 F.2d 356 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 20 times

    No. 12019. Argued February 4, 1957. Decided April 10, 1957. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Kleeb, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board filed pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor

  5. International Longshoremen's v. N.L.R.B

    277 F.2d 681 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 9 times
    In International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. N.L.R.B., 107 U.S.App.D.C. 329, 277 F.2d 681, 683, it was said: "The union had a right to present, even repeatedly, a demand concerning a non-mandatory subject of bargaining, so long as it did not posit the matter as an ultimatum."

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Volney Felt Mills

    210 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times

    No. 11982. February 23, 1954. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, H. Herrick, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for petitioner. Samuel Lang, New Orleans, La., Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., on the brief, for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The respondent assails the validity of an order of the Board directing it to bargain with a union of its employees and for other remedial measures