§

District 30, UMW

163 N.L.R.B. 562 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
District 30, UMW

9 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Garner v. Teamsters Union

    346 U.S. 485 (1953)   Cited 690 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

  3. Building Service Union v. Gazzam

    339 U.S. 532 (1950)   Cited 182 times
    In Building Service E.I.U. v. Gazzam, 339 U.S. 532, 94 L.Ed. 1045, 70 S.Ct. 784 (1950), the representatives of the unions called upon Gazzam to sign a contract which would require his fifteen employees at the Enetai Inn to join their union.

  4. United Bro., Carp. Joiners, Am. v. Brown

    343 F.2d 872 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 45 times
    In United Brotherhood of Carpenters Joiners v. Brown, 343 F.2d 872 (10th Cir. 1965), the court held that a trusteeship was improper when a local merely failed to affiliate with a district council and pay increased dues. Gordon, supra, distinguished Brown as not involving collective bargaining, the crucial element which legitimized the trusteeship in Gordon.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, Int. Bro. of Teamsters

    314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 224, Docket 27524. Argued December 4, 1962. Decided January 28, 1963. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., Attys.), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., submitted brief for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  6. Flight Engineers Inter. v. Continental Air

    297 F.2d 397 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times

    No. 17071. October 23, 1961. Rehearing Denied December 7, 1961. I.J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., and William B. Peer, Washington, D.C., for appellant, Zimring, Gromfine Sternstein, Washington, D.C., Brundage, Hackler Flaum, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel. Holland Hart, Patrick M. Westfeldt, Denver, Colo., Gibson, Dunn Crutcher and William F. Spalding, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Continental Air Lines. Leland, Plattner Kalik, Beverly Hills, Cal., Henry Weiss

  7. N.L.R.B. v. United Fur. Wkrs. of Am., Afl-Cio

    337 F.2d 936 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 84, Docket 28967. Argued October 2, 1964. Decided October 28, 1964. Stephen B. Goldberg, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Atty. Gen., George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Martin Raphael, General Counsel, United Furniture Workers of America, AFL-CIO, for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions

  8. Cuneo v. United Shoe Workers of America, Etc.

    181 F. Supp. 324 (D.N.J. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    Civ. No. 100-60. February 26, 1960. Jacques Schurre, of National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rothbard, Harris Oxfeld, Newark, N.J., Cooper, Ostrin DeVarco, Eugene N. Sosnoff, New York City, for respondents. MEANEY, District Judge. This proceeding is before the court on a petition filed on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (Board herein), pursuant to Section 10 (l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 61 Stat. 149, 73 Stat. 544, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160

  9. Section 402 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 402   Cited 418 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining an "employer" as "an employer within the meaning of any law of the United States. . . ."