Distributive Workers of America

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by ยง 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
  2. Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 37 times

    Nos. 17619, 17512. January 21, 1960. C. Paul Barker, Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, New Orleans, La., Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel, for Seafarers' International Union of North America, and others. Bernard Marcus, Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for Superior Derrick Corp. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Norton

  3. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Milk Drivers Dairy Emp. L. U. 584

    341 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 288, Docket 29130. Argued January 12, 1965. Decided January 26, 1965. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Bruce H. Simon, New York City (Robert S. Savelson, New York City, of counsel, and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON