§

Disney Roofing & Material Co.

145 N.L.R.B. 88 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Disney Roofing & Material Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 514 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. Halliday v. U.S.

    315 U.S. 94 (1942)   Cited 27 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 101. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided January 19, 1942. 1. Evidence held sufficient to go to the jury on the question whether petitioner, holder of a War Risk Insurance policy expiring October 31, 1920, was totally and permanently disabled on or before that day, and thereafter. P. 96. 2. In proving that the insured became totally and permanently disabled before the expiration of his War Risk contract, evidence of his conduct and

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Natl. Garment Co.

    166 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1948)   Cited 29 times

    No. 13570. January 7, 1948. Rehearing Denied February 5, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against National Garment Company and another for enforcement of order requiring respondents to cease and desist from unfair labor practices and to bargain collectively. Enforcement ordered. Charles K. Hackler, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of St. Louis, Mo. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand

  5. N.L.R.B. v. United States Air Conditioning

    302 F.2d 280 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. United States Air Conditioning Corp., 302 F.2d 280 (1st Cir. 1962), the corporate restructuring changed no management personnel but resulted in the firing of the production employees of a subsidiary, all of whom were union members.

  6. Paudler v. Paudler

    185 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times
    In Paudler, the Fifth Circuit recognized an individual's right to change domicile for any reason at any time. The jurisdictional inquiry is limited to the fact of relocation and the intended and presumed permanency of that relocation; it does not include consideration of the motivation for making that change.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Fiore Brothers Oil Company

    317 F.2d 710 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times
    In Fiore Brothers Oil Company, supra, a non-supervisory employee, son-in-law of the company president, solicited authorization cards for the assisted union during working time, a supervisor arranging a meeting with an employee to facilitate solicitation.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.

    130 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 10 times

    No. 3549. September 16, 1942. Petition for an Order to Show Cause and an Order to Adjust in Contempt. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to have the Reed Prince Manufacturing Company and certain of its officers adjudged in contempt of court. Order in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jay Clark, Jr., and George H. Mason, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER