§

Dish Network Corporation

366 NLRB No. 119 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Dish Network Corporation

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  3. Serramonte Oldsmobile, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"

  4. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that when, among other factors, a new negotiator was substituted, "the lack of a significant bargaining history would dictate giving the parties a fuller opportunity to effect an agreement than occurred here"

  5. Continental Insurance Company v. N.L.R.B

    495 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times
    In Continental Insurance Co. v. NLRB, 495 F.2d 44 (2d Cir. 1974), a finding of bad faith was predicated in part on (1) the company's refusal to recognize the union as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative unless the union agreed not to organize or represent other company employees, (2) the company's insistence that arbitrators of grievances be picked exclusively by the company and (3) wage, vacation and severance pay proposals substantially less generous than the benefits provided to employees before the union was certified.

  6. Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B

    827 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 11 times

    No. 85-1475. August 25, 1987. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on respondent's petition for rehearing. Timothy J. O'Rourke, Marshall F. Berman and Michael A. Pace, Washington, D.C., were on petitioner's response to the petition for rehearing. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MIKVA and BORK, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hi-Way Billboards, Inc.

    500 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    Reversing Board's finding that impasse is akin to hiatus in negotiations.

  8. Houchens Market of Elizabethtown v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    In Houchens, for example, the union initially told the employer that "any contract proposal or recommendation would be subject to approval by the employees."

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Remodeling by Ottmanns, Inc.

    719 F.2d 1420 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 2 times

    No. 83-1178. Submitted October 12, 1983. Decided November 9, 1983. Nelson Harding, Roger J. Miller and Dale E. Bock, Omaha, Neb., for respondent. William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William Wachter, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ralph C. Simpson, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ROSS, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior

  10. Movers Wrhsemen's Ass'n, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    550 F.2d 962 (4th Cir. 1977)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that because employers cannot insist on bargaining about permissive subjects, they "certainly ... may not so insist to the point of lockout the ultimate weapon in the labor relations arsenal"