§

Diponia Construction Co.

07-CA-052281 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 17, 2010)
Diponia Construction Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. Nova Plumbing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    330 F.3d 531 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that contractual language alone cannot establish a § 9 relationship where the union actually lacks majority support

  5. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.

    219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Lasko Metal Products, Inc.

    363 F.2d 529 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    No. 16520. July 7, 1966. Warren M. Laddon, NLRB Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Judson Harwood, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. After a union organizing campaign which was met by considerable company resistance

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  9. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it