§

Dilling Mechanical

25-CA-025094 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 28, 2003)
Dilling Mechanical

10 Cited authorities

  1. Butz v. Economou

    438 U.S. 478 (1978)   Cited 3,940 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ALJs are entitled to absolute immunity from suit for damages stemming from official acts because they are "functionally comparable" to judges

  2. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

    508 U.S. 49 (1993)   Cited 1,155 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding litigants immune from an antitrust claim under Noerr-Pennington immunity

  3. Federal Maritime Comm'n v. South Carolina Ports A.

    535 U.S. 743 (2002)   Cited 561 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress may not use "Article I powers to create court-like administrative tribunals where sovereign immunity does not apply"

  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  5. BEK CONSTR. CO. v. NLRB

    536 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 310 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment right to petition the government extends to the courts

  6. Pan-American Life v. Cypress Fairbanks

    522 U.S. 862 (1997)   Cited 19 times

    No. 97-98. October 6, 1997, October TERM, 1997. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 110 F. 3d 280.

  7. Dilling Mechanical Contractors v. N.L.R.B

    107 F.3d 521 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 95-3407 and 95-3641 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 DECIDED FEBRUARY 21, 1997 Michael L. Einterz (argued), Indianapolis, IN, for Dilling Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Aileen A. Armstrong, Peter D. Winkler, Vincent Falvo (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, Walter Steele, National Labor Relations Board, Indianapolis, IN, for National Labor Relations Board. William R. Groth, Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for Indiana

  8. Wright Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    200 F.3d 1162 (8th Cir. 2000)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-2121, 99-2309 Submitted: October 20, 1999 Filed: January 19, 2000 Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Gregg J. Caveneau of Maple Grove, MN. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Julie B. Brodio of NLRB of Washington, D.C. Nora H. Leyland of Washington, D.C. argued for Amicus IBEW. Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Wright Electric

  9. BEK CONST. CO. v. N.L.R.B

    246 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2001)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In BEK Construction Co. v. NLRB, 246 F.3d 619, 626-27 (2001), rev'd on other grounds, 536 U.S. 516, 122 S.Ct. 2390, 153 L.Ed.2d 499 (2002), we were faced with the question whether a union whose members work for construction subcontractors possess a § 7 right that could potentially be violated by the nonunion contractor-employer when the employer filed baseless lawsuits in retaliation for the union's activities.

  10. Section 153 - National Labor Relations Board

    29 U.S.C. § 153   Cited 383 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Establishing National Labor Relations Board with an explicit removal limitation