§

Diannia Estrada, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01984525 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 28, 2001)
Diannia Estrada, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,720 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,633 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Smith v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

    770 F.2d 719 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 97 times
    Finding much stronger comparative evidence insufficient as a matter of law