§

Dianne R. Jimenez v. Richard Fowler

No. 91106850 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 18, 1999)
Dianne R. Jimenez v. Richard Fowler

3 Cited authorities

  1. Kellogg Co. v. Pack'em Enterprises, Inc.

    951 F.2d 330 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 14 times
    Concluding that “substantial and undisputed differences” between the parties' use of FROOTEE ICE and FROOT LOOPS warranted summary judgment because “the dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties itself made it unlikely that confusion would result from the simultaneous use of the marks”

  2. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Olympus Corp.

    931 F.2d 1551 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    No. 91-1011. May 2, 1991. Don B. Finkelstein, Ladas Parry, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for appellant. Allen J. Baden and Jonathan D. Reichman, Kenyon Kenyon, of New York City, argued, for appellee. With them on the brief, was William T. Boland, Jr. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Hewlett-Packard Company appeals from the final decision of the United States Patent

  3. Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. U.S. Distilled Prod

    952 F.2d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-1268. Cancellation No. 17,568. December 18, 1991. Charles R. Mandly, Jr., Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard Geraldson, of Chicago, Ill., argued for petitioner-appellant. With him on the brief were Beverly W. Pattishall and M. Blair Tenney. Lewis R. Shafer, Buchman O'Brien, of New York City, submitted for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, ARCHER and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges. RICH, Circuit Judge