5 Cited authorities
In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 193 times 33 Legal AnalysesReciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Century Life of America
970 F.2d 874 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Cited 39 timesFinding similarity between "CENTURY 21" and "CENTURY LIFE OF AMERICA" in part because "consumers must first notice th[e] identical lead word"
King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen
496 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1974) Cited 8 timesPatent Appeal No. 9245. June 6, 1974. J. Timothy Hobbs, Washington, D.C. (Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C.), attorney of record, for appellant. William B. Mason, Arlington, Va. (Mason, Mason Albright, Arlington, Va.), attorney of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 178 USPQ 121 (1973)
Stanadyne, Inc. v. Lins
490 F.2d 1396 (C.C.P.A. 1974) Cited 5 timesPatent Appeal No. 9145. February 14, 1974. Daniel C. McEachran, Parker, Plyer McEachran, Chicago, Ill., attorneys of record, for appellant. Walter C. Farley, Roylance, Abrams, Kruger, Berdo Kaul, Washington, D.C., attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, Presiding Judge, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges, and KASHIWA, Judge, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation. RICH, Presiding Judge. This appeal is from the decision
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 96,382 times 95 Legal AnalysesFinding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint