DHL EXPRESS INC.
5 Cited authorities
New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.
560 U.S. 674 (2010) Cited 141 times 49 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
Harris v. Margaretten Co.
100 F.3d 950 (4th Cir. 1996) Cited 15 timesAffirming dismissal under Rule 41(b) where, inter alia, plaintiff was "personally involved in proceedings had personal knowledge of the dangers of failure to comply with court-ordered deadlines" "the history of proceedings demonstrate[d] nothing but continual warnings from the court of the need to comply with court orders" "none of [plaintiff's] filings were timely," and defendant was prejudiced by having "to expend resources to defend a suit and attempt trial preparation without the required participation by [plaintiff]."
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
228 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2000) Cited 10 timesUpholding designation of check-in area as “mixed-use” because that area “transformed into a congregation point for the drivers to drink coffee, read magazines and newspapers, and converse before their morning shift”
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
97 F.3d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 13 timesFinding 8 violation after determining company regularly, and over a period of time, allowed non-union solicitations while prohibiting union solicitations
N.L.R.B. v. Transcon Lines
599 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1979) Cited 10 timesHolding the Board's mixed-use designation to be supported by substantial evidence because the drivers' room was an area where employees could relax, drink coffee or eat snacks, and converse freely even though some work was occasionally conducted there