§

Detroit Newspapers

342 N.L.R.B. 1268 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Detroit Newspapers

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  5. Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    30 F.3d 922 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 34 times
    Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. New Orleans Cold Storage & Warehouse Co., Ltd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    201 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting a company's argument that the employee would have been terminated regardless of his union activity where the evidence was that the company did not ordinarily enforce certain rules and procedures

  8. Detroit Typographical Union No. 18 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    216 F.3d 109 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 8 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting petition for review because Board conclusion constituted legal error

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. General Sec. Serv

    162 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 8 times

    No. 97-6240. Argued: November 5, 1998. Decided and Filed: December 10, 1998. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 8-CA-28064. Robert A. Boonin, (argued and briefed), James S. Rosenfeld (briefed), BUTZEL LONG, Detroit, Michigan, for Respondent. Sharon I. Block, (argued and briefed), NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Washington, D.C., Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr. (briefed)

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lampi LLC

    240 F.3d 931 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-15054. January 30, 2001. Anna Francis, NLRB, Aileen A. Armstrong, Washington, DC, Thomas J. Walsh, Jr., Ford Harrison, LLP., Memphis, TN, for Petitioner. David C. Hagaman, Ford Harrison, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent. Petition for Review of an Application for Enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board. Before DUBINA, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We have for review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board which found that Appellant Lampi, LLC engaged in an

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355