§

Detroit Forming, Inc.

204 N.L.R.B. 205 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Detroit Forming, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Jencks v. United States

    353 U.S. 657 (1957)   Cited 1,103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. Gordon v. United States

    344 U.S. 414 (1953)   Cited 253 times
    In Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414, the petitioners had shown that written statements given to government agents by a key government witness contradicted the witness' trial testimony.

  4. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  5. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Ritchie Manufacturing Company

    354 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times

    No. 17978. December 14, 1965. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1966. Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, on the brief, for petitioner. Rex J. Ryden, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown; Iowa, H.G. Cartwright, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY

  8. Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a non-union employee engaged in protected concerted activity

  9. N.L.R.B. v. George E. Light Boat Storage, Inc.

    373 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times

    No. 22962. February 28, 1967. As Modified March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Rodin, Atty., NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert R. Breaker, LaPorte, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, BELL, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks a decree enforcing its order of July 2, 1965, against the George E. Light

  10. N.L.R.B. v. West Side Carpet Cleaning Co.

    329 F.2d 758 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 21 times

    No. 15147. March 31, 1964. Leo N. McGuire, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Armond D. Arnson, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent, Rocker, Kahn, Kleinman, Annan Morton S. Zaller, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief. Before MILLER, CECIL, and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 143 - Saving provisions

    29 U.S.C. § 143   Cited 54 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require an individual employee to render labor or service without his consent, nor shall anything in this chapter be construed to make the quitting of his labor by an individual employee an illegal act; nor shall any court issue any process to compel the performance by an individual employee of such labor or service, without his consent; nor shall the quitting of labor by an employee or employees in good faith because of abnormally dangerous conditions

  13. Section 102.118 - Present and former Board employees prohibited from producing documents and testifying; production of witnesses' statements after direct testimony

    29 C.F.R. § 102.118   Cited 57 times

    (a)Prohibition on producing files and documents. Except as provided in § 102.117 respecting requests cognizable under the Freedom of Information Act, no present or former employee or specially designated agent of the Agency will produce or present any files, documents, reports, memoranda, or records of the Board or of the General Counsel, whether in response to a subpoena duces tecum or otherwise, without the written consent of the Board or the Chairman of the Board if the document is in Washington