Designcraft Jewel Industries, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Alfred M. Lewis, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
587 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 34 times
Upholding refusal to defer to process of arbitration on a contract issue
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
Banyard v. N.L.R.B
505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974) Cited 35 times
In Banyard v. NLRB, 505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974), the District of Columbia Circuit reviewed decisions by the Board to defer to an arbitrator's award.
Beck Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
590 F.2d 290 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 12 times
No. 77-3210. December 13, 1978. Robert V. Magor (argued), Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Susan Papadopoulos, Atty. (argued), Washington, D.C., W. David Holsberry, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), Davis, Cowell Bowe, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MERRILL and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. The Honorable Jack E. Tanner, United States District Judge for the Western
Fafnir Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
362 F.2d 716 (2d Cir. 1966) Cited 24 times
Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule
Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. N.L.R.B
359 F.2d 983 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 19 times
In Puerto Rico Tel. Co. v. NLRB, 359 F.2d 983, 987 (1st Cir. 1966), and W. Mass. Elec. Co. v. NLRB, 573 F.2d 101, 106 (1st Cir. 1978), we held that subcontracting is not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining unless the subcontracting results in the displacement of union workers.
N.L.R.B. v. Custom Excavating, Inc.
575 F.2d 102 (7th Cir. 1978) Cited 6 times
No. 77-1495. Argued December 8, 1977. Decided March 9, 1978. Dorothy L. Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph W. Weigel, Milwaukee, Wisc., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS, SPRECHER and WOOD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In February 1977, the National Labor Relations Board ordered respondent Custom Excavating Company to cease and desist from refusing to bargain with Local 139 of the International Union of Operating Engineers

Designcraft Jewel Industries, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

Upholding refusal to defer to process of arbitration on a contract issue

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In Banyard v. NLRB, 505 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1974), the District of Columbia Circuit reviewed decisions by the Board to defer to an arbitrator's award.

Relying upon the “clear and unmistakable waiver” rule

In Puerto Rico Tel. Co. v. NLRB, 359 F.2d 983, 987 (1st Cir. 1966), and W. Mass. Elec. Co. v. NLRB, 573 F.2d 101, 106 (1st Cir. 1978), we held that subcontracting is not a mandatory subject of collective bargaining unless the subcontracting results in the displacement of union workers.