§

Deringer Mfg. Co.

201 N.L.R.B. 622 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Deringer Mfg. Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Prince Macaroni Manufacturing Co.

    329 F.2d 803 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 6171. March 31, 1964. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Stuart Broad, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. William F. Joy, Boston, Mass., with whom John J. Desmond, III, and Morgan, Brown, Kearns Joy, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Furnas Electric Company

    463 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times
    Deferring to a Board trial examiner's decision to accord limited probative weight to testimony that "resulted from the propounding of leading questions requiring little more than a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  7. Cooper Tire and Rubber v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    443 F.2d 338 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    No. 20757. May 10, 1971. Paul W. Walter, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Michael T. McMenamin, Walter, Haverfield, Buescher Chockley, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief. Russell J. Thomas, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, James P. Hendricks, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before McCREE and BROOKS, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"