Department & Specialty Store, Etc., Local 1265

15 Cited authorities

  1. Thornhill v. Alabama

    310 U.S. 88 (1940)   Cited 1,704 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
  2. Giboney v. Empire Storage Co.

    336 U.S. 490 (1949)   Cited 696 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speech integral to criminal conduct is not protected
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.

    354 U.S. 284 (1957)   Cited 163 times
    In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.
  4. Teamsters Union v. Hanke

    339 U.S. 470 (1950)   Cited 157 times
    Including footnote 5
  5. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  6. Plumbers Union v. Graham

    345 U.S. 192 (1953)   Cited 75 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. No. 86. Argued December 8, 1952. Decided March 16, 1953. The Virginia Right to Work Statute, as construed by the highest court of that State, provides in substance that neither membership nor nonmembership in a labor union shall be made a condition of employment and that a contract limiting employment to union members is against public policy. Held: 1. A Virginia state court injunction against peaceful picketing which is carried on for purposes

  7. McLeod v. Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks & Assistants, Local 89, Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union

    280 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 17 times

    No. 336, Docket 26120. Argued March 30, 1960. Decided July 6, 1960. Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Jerome L. Avedon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner-appellee. Jerome B. Lurie, New York City (Boudin, Cohn Glickstein, New York City, on the brief), for Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks Assistants Union, Local 89, respondent-appellant. Benjamin D. Stein, New York

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 50

    245 F.2d 542 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 18 times

    No. 241, Docket 24293. Argued February 15, 1957. Decided May 23, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Norton J. Come, Franklin C. Milliken, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Howard N. Meyer, O'Dwyer Bernstien, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order directing the

  9. Getreu v. Bartenders and Hotel Restaurant Emp. U., (N.D.Ind. 1960)

    181 F. Supp. 738 (N.D. Ind. 1960)   Cited 12 times

    Civ. No. 116. January 19, 1960. Stanley A. Mestel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Jonas B. Katz, Brown Gettler, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant. Warren Eggleston, Ball Eggleston, Lafayette, Ind., Arthur R. Donovan, Kahn, Dees, Donovan, Kahn Shrode, Evansville, Ind., for Hotel Fowler, Inc. SWYGERT, Chief Judge. This cause came on to be heard upon the verified petition of John C. Getreu, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board)

  10. Brown for and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. Department and Specialty Store Emp. Union, Local 1265, R.C.I.A., Afl-Cio

    187 F. Supp. 619 (N.D. Cal. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Civ. No. 39139. June 8, 1960. Louis S. Penfield, Regional Atty., Region 20, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Carroll, Davis, Burdick McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant. BURKE, District Judge. This proceeding is before the Court on a petition filed by the Regional Director of the Twentieth Region of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board), pursuant to Section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 61 Stat. 149; 73 Stat. 544; 29 U.S.C.A