DePalma Printing Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"
  2. Harvey Aluminum

    335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Fitzgerald Mills Corporation

    313 F.2d 260 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 35 times

    Nos. 31, 32, 33, Dockets 27422, 27224, 27318. Argued October 11, 1962. Decided January 9, 1963. Morton Nambow, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Edward Wynne, New York City (Benjamin Wyle, New York City, on the brief), for Textile Workers Union. Theodore R. Iserman, New York City (Kelley Drye Newhall Maginnes

  4. Houchens Market of Elizabethtown v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    In Houchens, for example, the union initially told the employer that "any contract proposal or recommendation would be subject to approval by the employees."
  5. International U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B

    455 F.2d 1357 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times
    Upholding Board's finding ยง 8 violation when photographing union activity "continued long after it became apparent that there would be no violence on the picket line"
  6. N.L.R.B. v. John S. Swift Company

    277 F.2d 641 (7th Cir. 1960)   Cited 25 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. John S. Swift Co., 277 F.2d 641; National Labor Relations Board v. Knight Morley Corp., 251 F.2d 753; National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Silk Mills, 209 F.2d 155; National Labor Relations Board v. J.I. Case Co., 198 F.2d 919.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. M M Oldsmobile, Inc.

    377 F.2d 712 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that in context of National Labor Relations Act breach of contract is "not" ipso facto, an unfair labor practice
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Rod-Ric Corporation

    428 F.2d 948 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times
    In Rod-Ric, the Regional Director had issued a "Decision and Direction of Election" in which he used a formula to select the eligible voters.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hyde

    339 F.2d 568 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19350. December 15, 1964. Rehearing Denied February 4, 1965. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, George B. Driesen, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther F. Krause, Portland, Willard K. Carey, La Grande, Fredric R. Merrill, Krause, Lindsay Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before POPE, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: This case is before

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Big Run Coal Clay

    385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 2 times

    No. 17149. November 13, 1967. Richard S. Rodin N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Richard S. Rodin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, Ashland, Ky., for respondent. Before EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge, KENT, District Judge. Honorable W. Wallace Kent, Chief Judge, United States District Court