§

Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. d/b/a Coserv Electric

366 NLRB No. 103 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. d/b/a Coserv Electric

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Goya Foods

    525 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2008)   Cited 13 times
    Approving a decertification bar lasting up to one year

  6. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  7. Automotive Council v. N.L.R.B

    483 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices

  8. SFO Good-Nite Inn, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    700 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1295 11–1325. 2012-11-20 SFO GOOD–NITE INN, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Patrick W. Jordan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Nanette Joslyn. MacKenzie Fillow, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben,

  9. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation v. N.L.R.B

    297 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities

  10. BPH & Co. ex rel. HEPC Palmas, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    333 F.3d 213 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 6 times
    Holding a petitioner satisfied § 10(e) by briefing an argument before the Board despite it’s not having been in the petitioner’s exceptions