§
Dennis v. Comm'r

7 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Blumenthal

    236 N.Y. 448 (N.Y. 1923)   Cited 68 times

    Argued October 2, 1923 Decided November 20, 1923 Edmond E. Wise, Isaac Lande and Milton Winn for appellants. Frederick Hemley and James T. Brady for respondents. CRANE, J. Alfred Blumenthal and Hannah Blumenthal, his wife, were the owners as tenants by the entirety of the premises known as Nos. 503-505 West One Hundred and Eleventh street in the borongh of Manhattan, city of New York. They sold the premises, taking back from the purchaser a bond and mortgage executed to Alfred Blumenthal and Hannah

  2. Matter of Albrecht

    32 N.E. 632 (N.Y. 1892)   Cited 60 times
    In Matter of Albrecht (136 N.Y. 91) the court held that if the husband and wife each contribute to a joint investment and title is taken in their joint names to be held by them, their executors, administrators or assigns (as was done in this case), no presumption can arise that either intended to make a gift of his or her share to the survivor.

  3. Villone v. Villone

    135 Misc. 512 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1930)   Cited 4 times

    January 14, 1930. Ira M.J. Hovey, for the plaintiff. Tuttle, Rice Stockwell, for the defendant. HORTON, J. The question involved is: When a wife has joined in a deed of property of which she and her spouse are tenants by the entirety, and the husband has received the entire sales price, is the wife entitled to bring an equity action for an accounting of the proceeds? The defendant claims that the Married Woman's Acts, so called (now embodied in Dom. Rel. Law, art. 4, as amd.), have not abolished

  4. Matter of Grossman

    134 Misc. 724 (N.Y. Misc. 1929)   Cited 1 times

    September 21, 1929. E.M. Brown, for the Utica National Bank and Trust Company. Samuel Reichler [ E.D. Lee of counsel], for Lena Grossman. EVANS, S. The decedent died intestate on March 18, 1926. He left him surviving a widow, Lena Grossman, and two sons and a daughter, the issue of a former marriage. The children are now adults but were very young at the time of their father's second marriage. Mrs. Grossman was a widow and had three children when she married the decedent. The administrator and Mrs

  5. Brosnan v. Gaffney

    209 App. Div. 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)   Cited 3 times
    In Brosnan v. Gaffney (209 A.D. 430) the real property belonged solely to the husband, but it was sold and the court held that the purchase-money bond and mortgage taken in the name of husband and wife was held in common between the husband and wife and each had an equal share or ownership therein.

  6. Matter of Baum

    121 App. Div. 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)   Cited 6 times

    October 4, 1907. Leander B. Faber [ Charles H. Street with him on the brief], for the appellant. James J. Conway, for the respondent Breul. Henry D. Merchant for the respondents Durkel and Fortcher. GAYNOR, J.: This appellant and his wife owned a piece of real estate as tenants by the entirety. They conveyed it, and took back a purchase money bond and mortgage made payable to both of them for part of the purchase money. He owned another piece of real estate, conveyed it, she joining, and took back

  7. Matter of Thompson

    81 Misc. 86 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1913)

    May, 1913. Frank Hasbrouck, for executors. John J. Mylod, for state comptroller. HOPKINS, S. This is an appeal from an order assessing the transfer tax upon the estate of the above named decedent, based upon the report of the appraiser. He reported that one-half of a bond and mortgage given by one Eugene H. Pool to von Beverhout Thompson and Julia de Windt Thompson, his wife, upon which there was due at the date of the death, July 6, 1912, of said Julia de Windt Thompson for principal and interest