§

Deluxe Taxi Service

158 N.L.R.B. 1274 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Deluxe Taxi Service

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  2. Besig v. United States

    208 F.2d 142 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 30 times
    Affirming finding that Tropic of Cancer was obscene

  3. General Tire of Miami Beach, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20037. May 13, 1964. D.P.S. Paul, Parker Davidson Thomson, Paul Sams, Miami, Fla., for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel and Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. On the basis of a finding of violations of §§ 8(a)(1) and (3), the Board seeks enforcement of its cease and desist

  4. Riggs Distler Company v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 575 (4th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 8988. Argued October 1, 1963. Decided December 27, 1963. Everett L. Buckmaster and C. Gordon Haines, Baltimore, Md. (Wright, Robertson Dowell, and Buckmaster, White, Mindel Clarke, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Robert A. Armstrong, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent

  5. Farmers Co-op. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    208 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 15 times
    In Farmers Co-Operative Co. v. National Labor Rel. Bd., 208 F.2d 296 (8 Cir. 1953) an employee said to the manager "G____ d____ it, you s____ of b____," etc.

  6. Duncan v. United States

    48 F.2d 128 (9th Cir. 1931)   Cited 27 times
    In Duncan v. United States, 48 F.2d 128, on page 132, we stated that the test is whether or not the language alleged to be obscene would arouse lewd or lascivious thoughts in the minds of those hearing or reading the publication.

  7. Town of Torrington v. Taylor

    137 P.2d 621 (Wyo. 1943)   Cited 6 times

    No. 2239 May 25, 1943 APPEAL AND ERROR — MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — WORDS AND PHRASES — BLASPHEMY — PROFANE LANGUAGE. 1. Under statutes requiring appeals from municipal to district courts to be taken in the manner provided for appeals from justices of the peace, and directing a justice from whom such appeal is taken to file in the district court clerk's office a certified copy of the entries on his docket, etc., where defendant appealed from municipal court conviction to the district court, defendant

  8. Section 1464 - Broadcasting obscene language

    18 U.S.C. § 1464   Cited 81 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "obscene, indecent, or profane language" in radio communications