§

Delta Western, Inc.

19-CA-217975 (N.L.R.B. May. 30, 2019)
Delta Western, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 52 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  4. Club Monte Carlo Corporation, v. N.L.R.B

    821 F.2d 354 (6th Cir. 1987)

    Nos. 86-5708, 86-5829. Argued March 19, 1987. Decided June 18, 1987. Richard J. Sable, D'Agostini, McKinnon, Sable, Ruggeri, Sterling Heights, Mich., David Walker (argued), for petitioner, cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., James M. Darby, Christian Schumann, Corrina Metcalf (argued), Bernard Gottfried, Director, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent, cross petitioner. Petition for review from the NLRB. Before ENGEL and GUY, Circuit Judges