§

Delta Sandblasting Company, Inc.

20-CA-176434 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 16, 2018)
Delta Sandblasting Company, Inc.

21 Cited authorities

  1. Morton v. Mancari

    417 U.S. 535 (1974)   Cited 1,369 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Indian Commerce Clause empowers Congress to “single Indians out as a proper subject for separate legislation.”

  2. Hickerson v. City of New York

    525 U.S. 1067 (1999)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdiction to grant a divorce may exist without jurisdiction to adjudicate the parties' property rights

  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  4. United States v. De Bright

    730 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 139 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that deception by the use of such precatory terms as "I believe" will not defeat a perjury charge

  5. Bricklayers Local 21 v. Banner Restoration

    385 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that "the district court was entitled to conclude that [the company's] seven-year course of conduct manifested an intent to be bound to the terms of the CBA"

  6. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  7. United States v. Ponticelli

    622 F.2d 985 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that the fact that grand jury already had enough evidence to indict did not make alleged false statement any less relevant

  8. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  9. Veritas Health Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    895 F.3d 69 (D.C. Cir. 2018)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16-1058 C/w 16-1076, 16-1110 07-10-2018 VERITAS HEALTH SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Chino Valley Medical Center, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals, NUHHCE, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Intervenor Jamie Konn, argued the cause for petitioner Veritas Health Services, Inc. With him on the briefs was Jonathan Batten, Washington, DC. Glenn M. Taubman argued the cause for petitioner Jose Lopez, Jr. With him on the briefs

  10. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    671 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 50 times
    Finding that the "Union acted reasonably in relying" on Capitol-Husting's offer to match financial package offered by rival company that the Union was also negotiating with, such that Capitol-Husting was acting in bad faith to claim that Union's failure to expressly accept this offer nullified its obligation to abide by the contract

  11. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,979 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

  12. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,360 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials

  13. Section 1085 - Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status or critical status

    29 U.S.C. § 1085   Cited 75 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[a]ny surcharges ... shall be disregarded in determining an employer's withdrawal liability under section 1391 of this title," subject to certain exceptions