Delight Bakery, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gorbea, Perez & Morell, S. En C.

    300 F.2d 886 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 16 times

    No. 5918. March 27, 1962. Norton J. Come, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., Attorneys, were on brief, for petitioner. Jaime Pieras, Jr., San Juan, P.R., with whom Pieras Martin, San Juan, P.R., was on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and ALDRICH and GANEY, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Geigy Co.

    211 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13686. March 17, 1954. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Thomas R. Haley, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nathan R. Berke, Attorney, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Richard Ernst, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hunter Engineering Co.

    215 F.2d 916 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14881. September 29, 1954. Norton J. Come, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel; David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel; and Ruth V. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Glenn L. Moller, St. Louis, Mo. (Moller Talent, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and STONE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. STONE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Broadcasting

    209 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14540. February 12, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Louis Schwartz, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. William H. Bronson, T. Haller Jackson, Jr., Shreveport, La., Tucker, Bronson Martin, Shreveport, La., of counsel, for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. This is a small case, but the record, briefs, and appendix