§
Dektronics, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  3. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  6. Independent, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    406 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 19 times

    No. 24901. January 22, 1969. Frederick S. Kullman, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert S. Hillman, Nan C. Bases, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and CABOT, District Judge. SIMPSON, Circuit Judge: This action is before the Court upon the petition of Independent, Incorporated, to review and

  7. F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 36 times

    No. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Radcliffe

    211 F.2d 309 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times

    No. 13726. March 3, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, H.T. Herrick, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, J.L. Eberle, Boise, Idaho, for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and DRIVER, District Judge. DRIVER, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order, based

  9. Hickory Chair Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    131 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1942)   Cited 3 times

    No. 4971. November 12, 1942. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Hickory Chair Manufacturing Company to review a cease and desist order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Board sought enforcement of its order. Order of the Board affirmed and judgment to be entered enforcing the order. Louie A. Whitener and A.A. Whitener, both of Hickory, N.C. (Manley Whitener, of Hickory, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Louis Newman, Atty