§

Deister Concentrator Co., Inc.

253 N.L.R.B. 358 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Deister Concentrator Co., Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.

    574 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 38 times
    Striking employee swerved in front of and blocked another employee's car; second employee threw egg

  3. Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Key Motors Corporation

    579 F.2d 1388 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    No. 77-2240. Argued May 22, 1978. Decided August 9, 1978. Michael Murchison, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur D. Rutkowski, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before PELL and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and HARPER, Senior District Judge. Senior United States District Judge Roy W. Harper of the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri is sitting by designation. PELL, Circuit Judge. The sole issue in this application for enforcement is whether the National Labor Relations Board (Board)

  6. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.