§

Deep Distributors of Greater NY d/b/a The Imperial Sales, Inc.

365 NLRB No. 95 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
Deep Distributors of Greater NY d/b/a The Imperial Sales, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Drew-King v. Deep Distribs. of Greater NY, Inc.

    194 F. Supp. 3d 191 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)   Cited 2 times

    16-CV-1916 (SJF) (AKT) 07-05-2016 Kathy DREW-KING, Acting Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. DEEP DISTRIBUTORS OF GREATER NY, INC., d/b/a The Imperial Sales, Inc., Respondent. Emily A. Cabrera, Henry J. Powell, National Labor Relations Board, Brooklyn, NY, for Petitioner. Saul D. Zabell, Zabell & Associates, P.C., Bohemia, NY, for Respondent. FEUERSTEIN, District Judge Emily A. Cabrera, Henry

  2. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  3. Holsum de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.3d 265 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 3 times
    Finding substantial evidence of knowledge of union activities conducted in plain view in an open parking lot where the activities "could very well have been observed by any number of supervisors and managers"

  4. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  5. Rule 1006 - Summaries to Prove Content

    Fed. R. Evid. 1006   Cited 1,798 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a "summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court."