5 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.
337 U.S. 656 (1949) Cited 88 timesHolding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Vail Mfg. Co.
158 F.2d 664 (7th Cir. 1947) Cited 10 timesNo. 9107. January 2, 1947. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Vail Manufacturing Company for enforcement of order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition for enforcement granted. David A. Morse and A. Norman Somers, both of Washington, D.C., Francis X. Helgesen, of Buffalo, N.Y., and Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Gulshien, Associate Gen. Counsel, both
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Pearl Button
149 F.2d 311 (8th Cir. 1945) Cited 7 timesNo. 12971. May 8, 1945. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of order finding the American Pearl Button Company and another guilty of unfair labor practices. Order enforced in part and cause remanded for modification. Stephen M. Reynolds, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Winthrop A. Johns