Deco-AKAL JV

18 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.

    518 U.S. 839 (1996)   Cited 543 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the enactment of FIRREA breached certain government contracts
  2. Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn

    375 U.S. 96 (1963)   Cited 369 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he purpose of Congress is the ultimate touchstone" of preemption analysis
  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
  4. Paul v. United States

    371 U.S. 245 (1963)   Cited 277 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, without state assent to federal jurisdiction, the federal government is "an ordinary proprietor"
  5. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.

    302 U.S. 134 (1937)   Cited 403 times
    Concluding jurisdictional analysis having only examined state statute
  6. Algoma Plywood Co. v. Wis. Board

    336 U.S. 301 (1949)   Cited 114 times
    In Algoma P. V. Co. v. Wisconsin Empl. Rel. Bd., 336 U.S. 301, it was held that nothing in the Act precludes a state from prohibiting closed-shop contracts in whole or in part.
  7. Mason Co. v. Tax Comm'n

    302 U.S. 186 (1937)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that when Congress "validated and ratified 'all contracts'" in connection with a dam project, "the evidence [was] clear that the Federal Government contemplated the continued existence of state jurisdiction"
  8. Collins v. Yosemite Park Co.

    304 U.S. 518 (1938)   Cited 144 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Collins, we held that the Twenty-first Amendment did not give the States the power to regulate the use of alcohol within a national park over which the Federal Government had exclusive jurisdiction.
  9. Pacific Coast Dairy v. Dep't

    318 U.S. 285 (1943)   Cited 88 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the state of California was not authorized to regulate the sale of milk sold to war department located on federal enclave
  10. Lord v. Local Union No. 2088, Intern. Broth

    646 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the United States has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over lands, known as federal enclaves
  11. Section 3112 - Federal jurisdiction

    40 U.S.C. § 3112   Cited 90 times
    Relating to acquisition of federal jurisdiction over land ceded by States
  12. Section 15.03 - Definitions

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 15.03   Cited 7 times

    Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (a) of Section 15.10 of this Act, for purposes of this Act: (1) The term "attorney general" means the Attorney General of Texas or any assistant attorney general acting under the direction of the Attorney General of Texas. (2) The term "goods" means any property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and any article, commodity, or other thing of value, including insurance. (3) The term "person" means a natural person, proprietorship, partnership