Deborah J. Anderson, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,) Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,683 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co.

    833 F.2d 1406 (10th Cir. 1987)   Cited 561 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer liability could arise under the principles of Restatement 219 if: the employer was negligent or reckless; or the employee relied on the supervisor's apparent authority; or the supervisor was aided in his harassment by the existence of the agency relationship
  3. Snell v. Suffolk County

    782 F.2d 1094 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 398 times
    Holding that plaintiffs could establish hostile work environment where co-workers posted racially offensive materials, including Klu Klux Klan literature and a picture of a black man with a noose around his neck
  4. Highlander v. K.F.C. Nat. Management Co.

    805 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 144 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee understood she would be paid under the FWW method where, among other factors, the employee "had signed and acknowledged the explanatory calculation form indicating that she understood the Fair Labor Standard Act's fluctuating work week method of overtime compensation"
  5. Walker v. Ford Motor Co.

    684 F.2d 1355 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 158 times
    Holding that plaintiff established hostile environment where racial harassment made plaintiff “feel unwanted and uncomfortable in his surroundings,” even though it was not directed at him
  6. McKinney v. Dole

    765 F.2d 1129 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that sexual harassment, to be illegal, "need not take the form of sexual advances or of other incidents with clearly sexual overtones"
  7. Appendix to Part 1604 - Questions and Answers on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, Public Law 95-555, 92 Stat. 2076 (1978)

    29 C.F.R. § 1604 app to Part 1604   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that the bona fide occupational qualification as to sex should be narrowly interpreted