§

Deborah A. Lombardino, Complainant, v. Tom J. Vilsack, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, (Farm Service Agency), Agency.

0720070007 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 27, 2009)
Deborah A. Lombardino, Complainant, v. Tom J. Vilsack, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, (Farm Service Agency), Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,681 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,614 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  4. U.S. v. Smith

    576 F.3d 681 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Affirming the decision of a district court to dismiss an indictment without prejudice where there was no evidence of bad faith on the part of the government

  5. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,954 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"